By now you have seen the video of the obvious time traveler seen in a 1928 Charlie Chaplin movie outtake.
Here’s my take:
1. If this is indeed a time traveler, why go back in time as a frumpy old lady? Why not go back a few years first, say, to your 20′s when your knees don’t hurt and you are less, er, bitchy curmudgeonly.
2. Or, time travelers will not be holding a cell phone to their ear like we did in the 1990′s. Communication devices will be implants by then. Didn’t George Clark read Scott Adams’ post on this earlier?
3. Plus, she didn’t look anything like Steve Jobs in drag. We all KNOW Steve will be the first to go back in time. He’s working on this device right now. In partnership with Dean Kamen.
What do you think?
[youtube DF8WF3vGUn8]
12 users commented in " Explaining the Time Traveler Video "
My question GL is where are the cell towers to connect to?
or a better question—Is 1920 considered an out of network/roaming call?
Way out of network, methinks.
Haha, I laughed out loud at your first point.
And everyone keeps asking questions about cell towers and carries and such, but I think the real question is: who is she talking to?
Frankie—
Captain Kirk?
GL–The weirdest bit is her Bozo the Clown shoes. The feet in the shoes are obviously shorter than the shoes she/he (hey, George brought it up) is wearing. What does that mean? What sort of foot fetish is at work here? Were there even foot fetishes before the internet? Is she on the internet?
It’s obvious to me that this is the work of the same guys who made that bogus Sasquatch video some years back; there’s that same turn towards the camera thing, right? They are the real time travelers, planting evidence to make their scams more plausible.
Good points, Chris.
I think there is a real conspiracy at work here and I have NOT been invited. What do YOU think—did we really go to the moon???